Drawing for DU@LPHONE

USPTO serial 79033787

DU@LPHONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WIENER, MICHAEL
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DU@LPHONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Scientific, nautical, surveying, photographic, cinematographic, optical, weighing, measuring, signalling, checking (supervision), life-saving and teaching apparatus and instruments; apparatus and instruments for conducting, switching, transforming, accumulating, regulating or controlling electricity; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images, including data processing equipment and data apparatus; communication equipment, including wireless telecommunication and data communications equipment; apparatus, instruments and technical equipment for wireless communication between more portable computers, portable telephones, computers, telephones and service stations; chip-sets, including for mobile telephones, integrated circuit cards (smart cards) and chips (integrated circuits); software, including computer software; telephone apparatus, video telephones, IP telephones, telephone-answering machines, mobile telephones, telephones and wireless telephones and computer software and hardware in the form of gateways enabling the user to getting into contact with others throughout the world over the Internet, including technical equipment enabling the transfer of digital data; net work equipment; apparatus and instruments for transferring data by way of wireless technology, including Bluetooth, Digital Enhanced Cordless Telecommunications (DECT), Worldwide Digital Cordless Telecommunications (WDCT), Digital Communication Technologies (DCT), 2,4 Gigahertz (GHz), Global System for Mobile Communications/General Packet Radio Service (GSM/GPRS), Code- Division Multiple Access (CDMA), Time Division - Synchronous Code Division Multiple Access (TD-SCDMA), 3G (third generation) and Wireless Local-Area Network (WLAN); headsets based on wireless technology; alarms based on wireless technology; Digital Enhanced Cordless Telecommunications (DECT) repeaters; wireless telephone jacks for cable and satellite television; cordless phone line extenders for users of digital satellite receivers and set-top boxes; computer hardware and software in the form of gateways for surveillance of patients' blood pressure, weight and other conditions; apparatus and instruments for use in connection with telephone conversations over the Internet; apparatus for transferring interactive multimedia based services such as video conferences and online route navigation; car positioning systems (GPS)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 3, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Dec 2, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 20, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
May 11, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 24, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 2, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 2, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 24, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 10, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jul 10, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 2, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 2, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 23, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 6, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 6, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 2, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 1, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 8, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Feb 8, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance