USPTO serial 79033840
TECHNOSTEP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TECHNOSTEP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Landings, namely mounting structures for sitting or standing places; landing places, namely mounting structures for sitting or standing places for seating and standing areas, stands, platforms, floors, all the above products also with supporting framework or supporting structures, predominantly of metal | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | Landings, namely mounting structures for sitting or standing places; landing places, namely mounting structures for sitting or standing places for seating and standing areas; stands, platforms, floors, all the above products also with supporting framework or supporting structures, predominantly not of metal | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | Stands (or constructions) for ascending seatings | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Assembly of ascending seating, landings, landing places for seating and standing areas, stands, platforms, floors for third parties for a fee | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Technical planning and technical structural planning of ascending seating, landings, landing places for seating and standing areas, stands, platforms, floors for third parties for a fee | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 23, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |