USPTO serial 79034071
GIGGLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3283317Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 21, 2007
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GIGGLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NL
DE
DE
DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James M. Weatherly
James M. Weatherly Cochran Freund & Young LLC2026 Caribou DriveSuite 201Fort Collins, CO 80525Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | [ Agricultural, horticultural and forestry products, namely, seeds and bulbs for agricultural purposes, agricultural seeds, spores and spawn for agricultural purposes, agricultural grains for planting, seeds and bulbs for horticultural purposes, living trees, non-debarked timber, unsawn timber, raw timber, unprocessed timber; grains, namely, unprocessed grains, agricultural and horticultural grains for planting; fresh fruits and vegetables; agricultural and horticultural seeds, namely, crop seeds, grass seeds, plant seeds; ] natural plants and flowers, namely, live ornamental plants, live young ornamental plants, live rooted and unrooted cuttings of ornamental plants and herbs for propagation, [ fresh herbs, ] live flowering plants, living plants, [ living fruit plants, ] live flowers, all of the aforesaid goods except roses and rose bushes [; malt for brewing and distilling ] | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Grünewald Veredelings B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Jungpflanzen Grünewald GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Jungpflanzen Grünewald GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Jungpflanzen Grünewald GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named GIGGLES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 21, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 21, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2013 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2012 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 17, 2011 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 26, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 5, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 24, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |