USPTO serial 79034099
CREMA DI BALSAMICO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3623070Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 19, 2009
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CREMA DI BALSAMICO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL A. GROW
Michael A. Grow ARENT FOX LLP1717 K Street, NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5342UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | sauces | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ACETIFICIO CARANDINI EMILIO S.r.l.
- Other trademarks owned by ACETIFICIO CARANDINI EMILIO S.r.l.
- Other trademarks owned by ACETIFICIO CARANDINI EMILIO S.r.l.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named CREMA DI BALSAMICO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 25, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 25, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 19, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 11, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 16, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 15, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 12, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 18, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |