Drawing for DURAFLEX

USPTO serial 79034133

DURAFLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BENMAMAN, ALICE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DURAFLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007remote control cables, namely bowden cables for brakesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
012remote control cables, namely bowden cables for brakesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 21, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 20, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 7, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 13, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 13, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 13, 2009MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Jan 13, 2009ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Aug 7, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 24, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 24, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 29, 2008RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
May 29, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 30, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 30, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 31, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 30, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 14, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 14, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 14, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 13, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 12, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 23, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 22, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance