USPTO serial 79034134
MEXIDOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3476773Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 29, 2008
- Examiner
- MUNSON OTT, MARY DEIRDRE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEXIDOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Clarke Holman
John Clarke Holman Jacobson Holman PLLC400 7th St., NWWashington, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfumery; cosmetics; cosmetic creams; creams for leather; waxes for leather; hair lotions; lotions for cosmetic purposes, namely, skin and body topical lotions for cosmetic use; beauty masks; lipsticks; pomades for cosmetic purposes; shaving preparations; cosmetic preparations for baths; non-medicated toiletries; cosmetic preparations for skin care; shampoos; non-medicated shampoos for pets | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations, except the pharmaceutical preparations for oral and dental care, for use in complex therapy for the treatment of cervical carcinoma in oncogynecological patients and for the treatment of brachioplexopathy in breast cancer patients | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Obshchestvo s ogranichennoy; otvetstvennostyu; "Nauchno-proizvodstvennaya kompania; "Farmasoft"
- Other trademarks owned by Obshchestvo s ogranichennoy; otvetstvennostyu; "Nauchno-proizvodstvennaya kompania; "Farmasoft"
- Other trademarks owned by Obshchestvo s ogranichennoy; otvetstvennostyu; "Nauchno-proizvodstvennaya kompania; "Farmasoft"
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named MEXIDOL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 6, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 6, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 23, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 24, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 13, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2007 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Nov 24, 2007 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 5, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |