Drawing for ACE INTERACTIVE

USPTO serial 79034247

ACE INTERACTIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3480782Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 5, 2008
Examiner
LUDEMAN, JESSICA ANN
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ACE INTERACTIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith D. Moore

Keith D. Moore Video Gaming Technologies, Inc.308 Mallory Station RoadFranklin, TN 37067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware; terminals, namely, central processing units for data collection, processing, display and/or the playing of interactive games; computer software, namely, computer software for gaming purposes and on-line gaming, electronic gaming system apparatus, namely, gaming machines; gaming machines and parts and accessories, namely, software modules and pre-recorded computer game programs; storage media and components, namely, flash drives, erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM) chips; recording discs, namely, blank CD-ROMS for sound or video recording; apparatus for recording, transmission, reproduction or display of sound or images; storage media, namely, compact discs, pre-recorded digital versatile discs featuring game programs; data processing equipment, namely, central processing units; electronic systems, namely, central processing units for linking gaming and poker machinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
041Gaming services, namely, gaming services provided on-line in the nature of online card and poker games and games of chance; providing on-line computer games; operation, organization and provision of gaming machines that provide bonus-payout systems via a global computer network; providing training in relation to the use of, installation, maintenance and repair of on-line gaming systems, games and apparatus; providing advisory, information and consultancy services in relation to the aforementioned servicesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 18, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 18, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2016INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 14, 2016XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 14, 2016XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Nov 27, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 6, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 24, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 24, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 5, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 5, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 24, 2010ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 14, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 8, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2009CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Mar 2, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 5, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 5, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 20, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 30, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 12, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 12, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 2, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 2, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 12, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2007ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 13, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 29, 2007CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED—
Oct 18, 2007GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 18, 2007GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 18, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 19, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 19, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 6, 2007LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 5, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 7, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 20, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 20, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 16, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 15, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance