Drawing for CLECIM SIAS

USPTO serial 79034271

CLECIM SIAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3488811Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 19, 2008
Examiner
HAMMEL, LAURA A
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLECIM SIAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Neil F. Greenblum

Neil F. Greenblum Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C.1950 Roland Clarke PlaceReston, VA 20191-1411UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machine tools, namely, metalworking machine tools; machines, namely, electric machines for moving or positioning image acquisition apparatusSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
009Surface inspection apparatus and defect detection apparatus for long metallurgical and iron and steel products, for bands and sheets, namely, image acquisition cameras, electronic circuits for real time image acquisition interfaces, color cameras, charge-coupled device photo-electric sensors for self-emitted infrared light and for reflected visible light, charge-coupled device digital cameras and real time interface circuits for charge-coupled device digital cameras, calculators for image acquisition, image display apparatus, namely, video screens and computer screens; real time image acquisition software, image recognition software, pattern recognition software, color recognition software, image contrast recognition software, data sorting software and data classification software for use with the aforementioned surface inspection apparatuses and defect detection apparatusesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
011LED striplightsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Computer programmingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 20, 2016INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 1, 2016XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2016XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Nov 20, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 20, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 4, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 10, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 10, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 19, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 28, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 28, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 19, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 7, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 7, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 3, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 14, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 28, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 28, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 28, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 7, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 7, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 7, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 1, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 5, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 12, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 12, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 13, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 13, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 10, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 9, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance