USPTO serial 79034285
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Stichting Nationaal Lucht- en; Ruimtevaartlaboratorium
NL
Other trademarks owned by Stichting Nationaal Lucht- en; Ruimtevaartlaboratorium
Stichting Koninklijk Nederlands
NL
Stichting Nationaal Lucht- en; Ruimtevaartlaboratorium
NL
Other trademarks owned by Stichting Nationaal Lucht- en; Ruimtevaartlaboratorium
Stichting Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium
Amsterdam, NL
Other trademarks owned by Stichting Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary Catherine Merz
Mary Catherine Merz Merz & Associates, P.C.408 MADISON STREET, SUITE AOak Park, IL 60302UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | [ Installation, maintenance and repair of electrical, electronic, control, testing and measuring apparatus and instruments in the field of aviation, space travel and navigation; maintenance of computer hardware, in particular in the field of aviation and space travel ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Research, design and development in scientific and industrial sectors, in particular in the field of aviation and space travel, namely, drawing up expert reports with regard to aforesaid services in the field of aviation and space travel; services of engineers, namely, in the field of aviation and space travel; industrial design and drawings; material testing of tools, machines and aircrafts; research, maintenance and development of software and communication technology, except for maintenance of hardware, in particular in the field of aviation and space travel; research and development of hardware, in particular in field of aviation and space travel; consultancy in the field of computer hardware and communication technology, in particular in the field of aviation and space travel | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 15, 2025 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2019 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 15, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 8, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| May 15, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 4, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 22, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 4, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 21, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 19, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 3, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 3, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |