USPTO serial 79034332
INTRUM JUSTITIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3423105Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 6, 2008
- Examiner
- TENG, SIMON
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTRUM JUSTITIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott Greenberg
Scott Greenberg Morgan & Finnegan, L.L.P.3 World Financial CenterNew York, NY 10281-2101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising; business management; business operation, business administration and office functions | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 036 | Insurance services, namely, insurance consultation services; financial affairs, namely, financial analysis services, debt recovery and collection agency services, credit inquiry and consultation services; monetary affairs, namely, cash management services | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Legal services in the field of debt collection | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Intrum Justitia Licensing AG
- Other trademarks owned by Intrum Justitia Licensing AG
- Other trademarks owned by Intrum Justitia Licensing AG
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named INTRUM JUSTITIA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 24, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 1, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 7, 2009 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 19, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2007 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 13, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |