Drawing for TECHKING

USPTO serial 79034341

TECHKING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3418544Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 29, 2008
Examiner
BROWNE, DAYNA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with TECHKING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael T. Smith

Michael T. Smith BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCH, LLP8110 Gatehouse Road, Suite 100 EastFalls Church, VA 22042UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Tyres for vehicle wheelsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 1, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2021EWORTEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2021EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Jun 11, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 4, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 4, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 1, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 23, 2014CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 4, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Feb 4, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 4, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 16, 2014715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jan 16, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2008FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 19, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 19, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 29, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 29, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 12, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 23, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 4, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 3, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 3, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 3, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 20, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 7, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 1, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 17, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 17, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 17, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 16, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 2, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance