Drawing for DE STEFANI

USPTO serial 79034348

DE STEFANI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROACH, APRIL K
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DE STEFANI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages (except beers)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 13, 2020FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 4, 2020XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 4, 2020XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 4, 2020XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Feb 4, 2020XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Aug 23, 2019GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 7, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 22, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 21, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 8, 2009CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 14, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 14, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 22, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 7, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 7, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 3, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 16, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 16, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 13, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 12, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance