USPTO serial 79034365
MUK.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 19, 2008
- Examiner
- BELLO, ZACK
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with MUK.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
AU
Kama Australia Pty Ltd; as trustee for Kama Licensing Trust
BLACK HILL VIC 3350, AU
Other trademarks owned by Kama Australia Pty Ltd; as trustee for Kama Licensing Trust
Kama Australia Pty Ltd; as trustee for Kama Licensing Trust
BLACK HILL VIC 3350, AU
Other trademarks owned by Kama Australia Pty Ltd; as trustee for Kama Licensing Trust
Kama Australia Pty Ltd; as trustee for Kama Licensing Trust
BLACK HILL VIC 3350, AU
Other trademarks owned by Kama Australia Pty Ltd; as trustee for Kama Licensing Trust
LUSHIOUS PRODUCTS PTY LTD, as trustee fo
Melbourne VICTORIA, AU
Other trademarks owned by LUSHIOUS PRODUCTS PTY LTD, as trustee fo
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle E. Kouba
Michelle E. Kouba MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP100 E. Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 3300Milwaukee, WI, 53202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair care products namely, hair gels, hair waxes, hair mousses, hair styling products, namely shampoos, conditioners, straightening preparations, finishing serums, styling pastes, styling mud, hair styling preparations, hair curl definers, hair thickening creams, hair sprays, hair lotions, non-medicated preparations for hair care, styling and beauty of hair | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MUK HAIR CARE PTY LTD
- Other trademarks owned by Kama Australia Pty Ltd; as trustee for Kama Licensing Trust
- Other trademarks owned by Kama Australia Pty Ltd; as trustee for Kama Licensing Trust
- Other trademarks owned by Kama Australia Pty Ltd; as trustee for Kama Licensing Trust
- Other trademarks owned by LUSHIOUS PRODUCTS PTY LTD, as trustee fo
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named MUK.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 2, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 22, 2014 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 20, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 11, 2008 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 21, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |