Drawing for VALE D' ALGARES

USPTO serial 79034396

VALE D' ALGARES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3505439Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 23, 2008
Examiner
HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
Law office
MADRID PROCESSING UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VALE D' ALGARES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Frank Terranella

FRANK TERRANELLA ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 THIRD AVENUE10TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033WineSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 2, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 17, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 29, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2016XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 27, 2016XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Dec 24, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 24, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 6, 2009FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 13, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 13, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 23, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 23, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 18, 2008CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jul 8, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 18, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 13, 2008CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 4, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 28, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 15, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 27, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 27, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 27, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 4, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 3, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 11, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 22, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 22, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 22, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 1, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 13, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 23, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 23, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 22, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 21, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance