USPTO serial 79034420
CHONDROTISSUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEIN, JAMES W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHONDROTISSUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE J. CRAIN
LAWRENCE J. CRAIN GREER, BURNS & CRAIN, LTD.300 SOUTH WACKER DRIVE - STE 2500CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Medical devices, namely, biological cartilage, intervertebral disc, meniscus, tendon, bone and connective tissue substitutes intended for subsequent implantation; surgical implants, namely, hyaluronic acid, biological polymers, bioresorbable polymers and combinations thereof; biological implants, namely, hyaluronic acid, biological polymers, bioresorbable polymers and combinations thereof; pharmaceutical products for use in tissue and organ transplantation; health-care products, namely, biological cartilage, intervertebral disc, meniscus, tendon, bone and connective tissue substitutes intended for subsequent implantation; biomedical preparations; namely, preparations for use in tissue and organ transplantation | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Research, development of pharmaceutical preparations and medicines and consultancy in the field of biomedicine | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2010 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 26, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 22, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2007 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |