Drawing for DIPL.ING. HEINZ AHLBORN

USPTO serial 79034432

DIPL.ING. HEINZ AHLBORN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JACKSON, STEVEN W
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - MANAGING ATTORNEY

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIPL.ING. HEINZ AHLBORN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
015Musical instruments, in particular electronic organsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 2017PC.DPETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED—
Aug 21, 2017APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Aug 19, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2017TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 20, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 16, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 26, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 26, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 22, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 7, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 7, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 26, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 26, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 17, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 26, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 26, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 26, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 25, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance