Drawing for SUNLAKE

USPTO serial 79034437

SUNLAKE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POLZER, NATALIE M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUNLAKE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Laths of metal; pipes of metal; pipework of metal; gutter pipes of metal; branching pipes of metal; building materials of metal, namely soffits, fascia; wire of common metal; metal fluid storage tanksSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 9, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 8, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 23, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 30, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 28, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 22, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 7, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 7, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 28, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 28, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 22, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 21, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 2, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 19, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 13, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 23, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 23, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 22, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 21, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance