USPTO serial 79034515
PLASMATREAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PLASMATREAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard M. Goldberg
RICHARD M. GOLDBERG COHAUSZ & FLORACK25 EAST SALEM STREETSUITE 419HACKENSACK, NJ 07601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRICAL APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS COMPRISING A GENERATOR, A PLASMA JET OR AN ELECTRODE DEVICE AS ESSENTIAL COMPONENTS FOR THE TREATMENT OF SURFACES BY MEANS OF ELECTRICAL DISCHARGE AND/OR REACTIVE MEDIA, NAMELY, FOR SURFACE CLEANING, SURFACE ACTIVATION, COATING, AND FOR BINDING FILMS | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 1, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 28, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 18, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 10, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |