Drawing for MIESZKO TRUFLE ORYGINALNE

USPTO serial 79034547

MIESZKO TRUFLE ORYGINALNE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3423111Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 6, 2008
Examiner
KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MIESZKO TRUFLE ORYGINALNE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT BG HOROWITZ

ROBERT BG HOROWITZ COOPER & DUNHAM LLP30 ROCKEFELLER PLAZANEW YORK, NY 10112UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flour and preparations made from cereals, namely, breakfast cereals, cereal based snack foods and processed cereals; bread, pastry and confectionery in the name of pastilles, chewing gum and candy; flavored ices; fruit ices; treacle syrups; yeast, baking-power; salt, mustard; vinegar, condiment sauces; spices; iceSECTION 18 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 13, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 24, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 23, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jun 9, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 9, 2013C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Oct 9, 2013CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 30, 2013CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
May 7, 2013PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 22, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 25, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 25, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 6, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 19, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 30, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 14, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 8, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 8, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 8, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 8, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 7, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Nov 23, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 21, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 29, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 21, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 13, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 26, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 26, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 23, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 22, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2007RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Mar 20, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 19, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 8, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 8, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance