USPTO serial 79034606
MARBIR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 3, 2008
- Examiner
- KEARNEY, COLLEEN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with MARBIR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
S.S. MARMARA ZEYTIN TARIM; SATIS KOOPERATIFLERI BIRLIGI; MARMARABIRLIK
Bursa - Izmir, TR
Other trademarks owned by S.S. MARMARA ZEYTIN TARIM; SATIS KOOPERATIFLERI BIRLIGI; MARMARABIRLIK
S.S. MARMARA ZEYTIN TARIM; SATIS KOOPERATIFLERI BIRLIGI; MARMARABIRLIK
TR
Other trademarks owned by S.S. MARMARA ZEYTIN TARIM; SATIS KOOPERATIFLERI BIRLIGI; MARMARABIRLIK
S.S. MARMARA ZEYTIN TARIM; SATIS KOOPERATIFLERI BIRLIGI; MARMARABIRLIK
TR
Other trademarks owned by S.S. MARMARA ZEYTIN TARIM; SATIS KOOPERATIFLERI BIRLIGI; MARMARABIRLIK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Egbert
John S. Egbert Egbert Law Offices, PLLC1314 Texas, 21st FloorHOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Canned processed olives; processed olives; bottled processed olives; processed pureed olives; packaged olives, namely, packaged processed olives; processed frozen olives; fried olives; prepared processed olives; pickled olives; cured olives; olive pastes; processed olive puree; preserved olives; dried olives; cooked olives; tinned olives; edible fats; margarine; olive oil for food; processed oils and fats for food | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by S.S. MARMARA ZEYTIN TARIM; SATIS KOOPERATIFLERI BIRLIGI; MARMARABIRLIK
- Other trademarks owned by S.S. MARMARA ZEYTIN TARIM; SATIS KOOPERATIFLERI BIRLIGI; MARMARABIRLIK
- Other trademarks owned by S.S. MARMARA ZEYTIN TARIM; SATIS KOOPERATIFLERI BIRLIGI; MARMARABIRLIK
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named MARBIR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 4, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 27, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 25, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 3, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 3, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 2, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |