USPTO serial 79034618
REGENERSYS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3303004Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 2, 2007
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REGENERSYS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary Catherine Merz
Mary Catherine Merz Merz & Associates, P.C.1010 Lake Street, Suite 400Oak Park, IL 60301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management and commercial management for the benefit of operators of oil and gas fields and of traders in oil, gas and other energy products; providing office functions in relation to investments relating to oil, gas and other energy products | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 039 | Transport by truck, rail, air, ships and pipelines, namely distribution of energy, oil and gas | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Generating, producing and converting energy; services of refineries for oil, gas and other energy-products in the nature of petroleum, natural gas, bitumen and minerals; preserving and refining petroleum, natural gas and other bitumen and minerals, both in liquid, solid and gas form; technical consultancy concerning the treatment of oil, petroleum, natural gas and other bitumen and minerals, both in liquid, solid and gas form | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Geological services namely detection and exploration of oil wells, bitumen and minerals; consultancy regarding technologies and techniques for exploitation and extraction of raw materials | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Heerema Group Services S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Heerema Group Services S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Heerema Group Services S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named REGENERSYS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 3, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 9, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 4, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 5, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 17, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 25, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 7, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |