Drawing for PREMIUM

USPTO serial 79034673

PREMIUM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FARRELL, ANNE M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PREMIUM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Clarification preparations, must-fining preparations, finings preparations for clarifying wine, fruit juices, vinegar and beers; chemical substances for preserving foodstuffs; stabilizer and preservatives for must, wine, fruit juices, vinegard and beers; activators and nutrients for oenological yeastSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
030Yeast for wine-makingSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Sep 28, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 22, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 4, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 5, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 5, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 4, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 21, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 21, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 5, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 5, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 19, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 3, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 3, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 31, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 30, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 15, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance