USPTO serial 79034679
FOULARD'ART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3499248Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 9, 2008
- Examiner
- STEIN, JAMES W
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with FOULARD'ART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
I-50125 FIRENZE, IT
I-50125 FIRENZE, IT
I-50125 FIRENZE, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melinda B. Buurma
Melinda B. Buurma Howard & Howard Attorneys PLLC450 West Fourth StreetRoyal Oak, MI 48067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Scarves, shawls, neckties | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 4, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 4, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 19, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 17, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 12, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 9, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 10, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 10, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |