USPTO serial 79034692
LOTUS HALLMARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3488816Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 19, 2008
- Examiner
- KELLY, JOHN M
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LOTUS HALLMARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rawtenstall, Lancashire, GB
BRANDS GLOBAL LIMITED; c/o D. Jacobson & Sons Limited
GB
Other trademarks owned by BRANDS GLOBAL LIMITED; c/o D. Jacobson & Sons Limited
BRANDS GLOBAL LIMITED; c/o D. Jacobson & Sons Limited
Rawtenstall, Lancashire BB4 7PA, GB
Other trademarks owned by BRANDS GLOBAL LIMITED; c/o D. Jacobson & Sons Limited
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Miriam D. Trudell
Miriam D. Trudell Sheridan Ross P.C.1560 Broadway, Suite 1200Denver, CO 80202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | [ Bags, namely, tote bags, tote cases, sports bags, sports holdalls, carry on bags, clutch bags, handbags, duffle bags, shoulder bags, garment bags for travel, brief cases, key cases, luggage, toiletry and vanity cases sold empty, suitcases, overnight cases, trunks for travelling, valises, backpacks, rucksacks, travelling bags, satchels, fanny packs; carrying cases; holdalls, wallets, purses, umbrellas, parasols, walking sticks; articles of leather and of imitation leather, namely, key cases, key chains, key bags and key wallets ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Footwear; ankle boots, [ ballet shoes, belts, belts made of leather, blouses, ] boots, [ coats, dresses, ] espadrilles, [ gloves, hats, jackets, jeans, ] sandals, [ skirts, suits, shirts, trousers, twin sets and ] women's shoes, shoes [, slippers ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BRANDS GLOBAL LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by BRANDS GLOBAL LIMITED; c/o D. Jacobson & Sons Limited
- Other trademarks owned by BRANDS GLOBAL LIMITED; c/o D. Jacobson & Sons Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named LOTUS HALLMARK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 22, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Aug 19, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 20, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 20, 2014 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2014 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 1, 2010 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 3, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 14, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 20, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 20, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 31, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |