Drawing for ODEER

USPTO serial 79034706

ODEER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3472422Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 22, 2008
Examiner
HALMEN, KATHERINE E
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ODEER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Lamps; fluorescent lamp tubes; lighting apparatus, namely, bicycle lights, electric candelabras, chandeliers, sun lamps, filaments for electric lamps, flashlights, headlights for vehicles, klieg lights, electric Chinese lanterns, electric light bulbs, electric track lighting units, electric night lights, pen lights, electric lights for Christmas trees, lights for vehicles, lamp reflectors, searchlights; incandescent lamps; energy saving lamps; lighting fixtures; electric lighting fixtures, namely, power failure backup safety lighting; hangings for lamps, namely, lamp shades, glass lantern globes, lamp chimneys, lamp reflectors; aquarium lights; street lampsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 19, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 4, 2016INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 15, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 15, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 27, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 27, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 30, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 10, 2011CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 5, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 5, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 22, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 22, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 6, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 16, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 1, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 30, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 18, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 17, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 2007GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Sep 18, 2007GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Sep 14, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 2007ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 6, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 6, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 5, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 5, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 5, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 5, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 13, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 26, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 26, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 25, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 24, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 15, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance