USPTO serial 79034737
POWER-TITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3564782Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 20, 2009
- Examiner
- KELLY, JOHN M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POWER-TITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Braeside VIC 3195, AU
Braeside VIC 3195, AU
Braeside VIC 3195, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kyle T. Peterson
Kyle T. Peterson PATTERSON, THUENTE, SKAAR & CHRISTENSEN, P.A.4800 IDS CENTER80th South 8th StreetMinneapolis, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | POWER TOOLS, NAMELY, BATTERY OPERATED AND ELECTRIC HAND DRILLS AND DRIVERS; ROTARY HAMMER DRILLS; GRINDERS INCLUDING ANGLE GRINDERS; POWER OPERATED SAWS, INCLUDING CIRCULAR, RECIPROCATING AND JIG SAWS, MITRE SAWS INCLUDING COMPOUND MITRE SAWS; POWER SAW BENCHES; POWER ELECTRIC SANDERS, INCLUDING FINISHING, ORBITAL, RANDOM, DELTA AND BELT SANDERS; ELECTRIC PLANERS; POWER TOOLS, NAMELY, ROUTERS; POWER GARDENING TOOLS, NAMELY, STRING TRIMMERS, HEDGE TRIMMERS, BLOWERS, SWEEPERS, PRUNERS, CHAIN SAWS, EDGERS AND CULTIVATORS; POWER TOOL ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, POWER DRILL BITS AND SCREW DRIVER BITS; POWER SAW BLADES; GRINDING WHEELS AND CUTTER WHEELS; ABRASIVE BELTS FOR POWER ELECTRIC SANDERS, POLISHING AND BUFFING ACCESSORIES FOR POWER SANDERS, NAMELY, POLISHING BONNETS, POLISHING SPONGES, BACKING PADS, BUFFING WHEELS AND POLISHING PADS; ELECTRIC PLANER BLADES AND ROUTER BITS; PLUNGE ATTACHMENTS AND GAUGES FOR POWER DRILLS, NAMELY, ATTACHMENTS FOR HAND-HELD POWER DRILLS FOR ENABLING HAND-HELD POWER DRILLS TO BE USED AS A DRILL PRESS AND FOR USE WITH HAND-HELD POWER DRILLS FOR GAUGING DRILL DEPTH INTO A WORK PIECE; GUIDES, LASERS, AND LIGHT ACCESSORIES FOR ALL OF THE FOREGOING, NAMELY, LASER OR MECHANICAL GUIDE ATTACHMENTS FOR HAND-HELD POWER SAWS FOR ALIGNING THE POWER SAW WHEN CUTTING A WORK PIECE AND LIGHT ATTACHMENTS FOR HAND-HELD POWER DRILLS FOR ILLUMINATING A WORK PIECE; POWER GARDENING TOOL ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, TRIMMER, EDGER AND SAW BLADES; BLOWER BAGS, NAMELY, DUST COLLECTION BAGS SOLD AS PART OF POWER OPERATED BLOWERS; ELECTRICAL APPLIANCES, NAMELY, ELECTRICAL APPLIANCES FOR PREPARING DRINKS, AND FOR PREPARING FOOD, NAMELY, FOR MIXING, SLICING AND BLENDING FOOD, NAMELY, ELECTRIC FOOD BLENDERS, ELECTRIC FOOD CHOPPERS, ELECTRIC FOOD SLICERS AND ELECTRIC FOOD MIXERS; APPLIANCES FOR POLISHING, VACUUMING AND WASHING, NAMELY, ELECTRIC WAX POLISHING MACHINES FOR HOUSEHOLD PURPOSES, ELECTRIC WASHING MACHINES FOR INDUSTRIAL PURPOSES | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 12, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 12, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 21, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 4, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 15, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 16, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 16, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 16, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |