Drawing for CASALINI ...A NOI CI PIACE

USPTO serial 79034758

CASALINI ...A NOI CI PIACE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HELLMAN, ELI J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CASALINI ...A NOI CI PIACE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Flours and cereal preparations, bakery goods, bread, bread-sticks, rusks, breadsticks, batch bread, crackers, biscuits, fouaces, pastry, pasta, puffed corn, cereal flakes, tea, coffee, cocoa, chocolate, confectionery, sweets, honey, spices, savoury biscuitsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 18, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 17, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 26, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 31, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 31, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 4, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 21, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 21, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 31, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 31, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 26, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 4, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 4, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 31, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 30, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 15, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance