USPTO serial 79034805
LEOTRACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3499250Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 9, 2008
- Examiner
- KAUFMAN, LAURIE R
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LEOTRACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY H. GREGER
Jeffrey H. Greger LOWE HAUPTMAN HAM & BERNER, LLP2318 Mill RoadSuite 1400Alexandria, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs for use in marketing research, opinion polling, usability research, user experience research; computer programs to monitor, survey, track, analyze and meter the behavior of computer users, the usage of websites and the usage of technical devices with a graphical user interface * all the aforesaid goods not for computer-software relating to planning and execution of logistic processes * | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Marketing research; opinion polling | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Providing multiple user access to proprietary collections of information by means of computer information networks | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Updating of computer software for others; computer systems analysis; providing on-line non-downloadable software for use in data management on servers in the field of Usability research and User experience research; electronic data storage; computer programming for others, namely, implementation of computer programs in data networks; installation, maintenance and repair of computer software; computer services, namely, monitoring, testing, analyzing and reporting on the Internet traffic control and on the usability of websites of others *all the aforesaid services not related development and control of logistic procedures and executions * | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by nurago GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by SirValuse Consulting GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by SirValuse Consulting GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by SirValuse Consulting GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named LEOTRACE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 10, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 28, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 4, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 16, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 20, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2007 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 7, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |