USPTO serial 79034948
IMPLICITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEARNEY, COLLEEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IMPLICITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, brassieres, culottes, belts, corsets (clothing, foundation garments), articles of feminine lingerie, namely, nightgowns, pajamas, robes, overalls, shirts, petticoats body-suits and swimming suits; footwear; headgear, namely, hats, caps and visors | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 27, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 28, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 28, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 28, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 28, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 18, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2007 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 3, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 3, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 2, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |