Drawing for OXO BIKE

USPTO serial 79034963

OXO BIKE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3594979Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 24, 2009
Examiner
SALEM-HOWEY, AISHA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OXO BIKE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

NEIL F. GREENBLUM

Neil F. Greenblum Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C.1950 Roland Clarke PlaceReston, VA 20191-1411UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012All-terrain vehicles; land vehicles; cars; electric cars; go-kart transport trucks; sports utility vehicles; motorbikes; motorcycles; water scootersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
025[ Clothing, namely, jackets, T-shirts, sweatshirts, pants, gloves; footwear; headgear, namely, hats and caps, all for use in motor sports ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 14, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 17, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 18, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 18, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Oct 26, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 18, 2016XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 18, 2016XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 24, 2016INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 24, 2015PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
Mar 31, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 24, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 7, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 7, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 24, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 24, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 18, 2009TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Feb 18, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 18, 2009OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jan 13, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2008RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 16, 2008OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 15, 2008OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Jan 15, 2008OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Jan 14, 2008OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 25, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 5, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 19, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 19, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 16, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 10, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 10, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 10, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 10, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 20, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 20, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 19, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 23, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance