Drawing for CHATEAU BELAIR APPELLATION ST EMILION CONTRÔLÉE

USPTO serial 79035011

CHATEAU BELAIR APPELLATION ST EMILION CONTRÔLÉE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3431433Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 20, 2008
Examiner
RICHARDS, SUSAN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHATEAU BELAIR APPELLATION ST EMILION CONTRÔLÉE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN

LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 THIRD AVENUE10TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wines with appellation of origin from the wine-making estate called CHÂTEAU BELAIRSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 2017UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jul 20, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 20, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 24, 2017CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Apr 21, 2017CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 2, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 2, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 14, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 14, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Aug 26, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 21, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 12, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 3, 2008FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 9, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 9, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 20, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 20, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 4, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 4, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 13, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 25, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 25, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 13, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 13, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 3, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 9, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 1, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 11, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 11, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 11, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 10, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 23, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance