USPTO serial 79035053
NORMANNO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3436259Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 27, 2008
- Examiner
- BROWN, TINA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - MANAGING ATTORNEY
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NORMANNO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel Christopherson
DANIEL CHRISTOPHERSON LEHRMAN BEVERAGE LAW, PLLC2911 HUNTER MILL ROADSUITE 303OAKTON, VA 22124Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Marsala wines, wines and liqueurs | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2017 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Jul 24, 2017 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 18, 2017 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 27, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2014 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2014 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2014 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| May 17, 2014 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 17, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 5, 2014 | 15AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED | — |
| May 5, 2014 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2014 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2014 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 27, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 11, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 2, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 18, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 1, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 28, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |