Drawing for SITBEST

USPTO serial 79035058

SITBEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3436260Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 27, 2008
Examiner
GRIFFIN, JAMES
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SITBEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Clarke Holman

John Clarke Holman Jacobson Holman PLLC400 7th St., NWWashington, DC 20004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020FurnitureSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 29, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 10, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 10, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 28, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 28, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 17, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 17, 2014NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
Jun 17, 201471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 17, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 27, 2014ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2008FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 15, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 15, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 27, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 27, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 11, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 20, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 6, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 6, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 22, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 22, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 2, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 2, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 17, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 17, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 17, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 29, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 19, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 2, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 2, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 31, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 30, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 23, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance