Drawing for COSTA

USPTO serial 79035067

COSTA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COSTA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Restaurant furniture, counters for bars, shelves, bath furniture, kitchen furniture, doors, exhibition furniture, upholstered furniture, furniture partitions and accessories, furniture, mirrors, picture frames, office and conference furniture, non metallic and fixed napkins distributors, umbrella stands, corks for bottles, caps made of cork, non-metallic knife handles, metal tables, counters (tables)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 21, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Sep 20, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 1, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 7, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 1, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 30, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 2, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 28, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 28, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 30, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 30, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 24, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 4, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 4, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 4, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 3, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 26, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance