USPTO serial 79035073
FIRST DROP WINES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3445415Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 10, 2008
- Examiner
- BELLO, ZACK
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with FIRST DROP WINES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ATHELSTONE, SA 5076, AU
ATHELSTONE, SA 5076, AU
ATHELSTONE, SA 5076, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul W. Reidl
Paul W. Reidl Dickenson, Peatman & Fogarty1500 First Street, Ste 200Napa, CA 94559UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wine | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by First Drop Wines Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by First Drop Wines Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by First Drop Wines Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named FIRST DROP WINES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 9, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 28, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 1, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 28, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |