Drawing for CABERT

USPTO serial 79035118

CABERT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3348882Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 4, 2007
Examiner
CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with CABERT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard J. Groos

Richard J. Groos King & Spalding LLP500 W 2ND ST, STE 1800Austin, TX 78701UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wines, sparkling wines and grappasACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 12, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Dec 30, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 20, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 27, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Dec 4, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 18, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 2, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Apr 2, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2008FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 27, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 27, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 4, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 4, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 14, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 18, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 29, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 16, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 16, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 2, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 26, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 26, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 2, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 2, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 29, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 28, 2007RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Mar 28, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 24, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 23, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2007SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance