Drawing for RAAT

USPTO serial 79035156

RAAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3402079Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 25, 2008
Examiner
KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RAAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Street lights; electric holiday lights, namely, fairy lights for festive decoration; structural parts and fittings for lamps, namely, support member for hanging lamps; lamp casings; lamp reflectors; lamp glasses; ceiling lights; floodlights; fluorescent lamps; spotlights; fittings for incandescent lamps; fittings for discharge lamps; incandescent lampsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 4, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 9, 2019XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 9, 2019XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Aug 27, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 14, 2018CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Nov 30, 2018CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 11, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 11, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 20, 2017FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 6, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 6, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 11, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 11, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 19, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jun 30, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 31, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 22, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 14, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 14, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 25, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 25, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 8, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 19, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 3, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 3, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 26, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 11, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 11, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 3, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 11, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 11, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 10, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 9, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 30, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance