Drawing for INKTELLIGENT PRINTING

USPTO serial 79035182

INKTELLIGENT PRINTING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3488823Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 19, 2008
Examiner
THOMAS, AMY E
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INKTELLIGENT PRINTING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Neil F. Greenblum

Neil F. Greenblum Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C.1950 Roland Clarke PlaceReston, VA 20191-1411UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007[ Machines for the chemical industry, namely, ink jet-printing machines, aerosol-printing machines, screen-printing machines, dispensing machines, sintering machines, laser-sintering machines, micro-wave sintering machines; machines for plastics processing, namely, ink jet-printing machines, aerosol-printing machines, screen-printing machines, dispensing machines, sintering machines, laser-sintering machines, micro-wave sintering machines; metal working machines, namely, ink jet-printing machines, aerosol-printing machines, screen-printing machines, dispensing machines, sintering machines, laser-sintering machines, micro-wave sintering machines; machines for the printing industry, namely, printing machines for textiles, flexographic printing machines, printing machines for printed electronics, printing machines for medical coatings; machines for the coating of work pieces; gradient material making machines, used for combination of different materials, namely, metals and polymers, ceramics and bio-compatible materials, ceramics and metals, ceramics and polymers, metal and bio-compatible materials, for making different gradients of printing ink; parts and fittings of the aforesaid machines therefore ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
040[ Material treatment, namely, fabrication of surface coating, of 2 and 3-dimensional structural coating, and of gradient materials for printed antennas, printed electronics, printed optoelectronics, printed sensors, coated implants, printed electronic boards and catalytic coatings; material treatment information ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Scientific and industrial research; chemistry services; physics research; engineering; research and development of new products for others; surveying; services of a technical testing laboratory; material testing; computer programmingSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 16, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 11, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 24, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 24, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Apr 22, 2015INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 22, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2014C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 22, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 12, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 10, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 10, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 19, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 19, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 3, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 14, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 28, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 24, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 24, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 24, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 21, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2008CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jan 31, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 31, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 24, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 18, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jan 8, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 26, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 10, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 12, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 2, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 2, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 31, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 30, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 30, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance