USPTO serial 79035202
RIPLEY'S HOME VIDEO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIRIE, VERNA BETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RIPLEY'S HOME VIDEO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Cinematographic material restoration and recuperation services | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Services of cinematographic, video, television, theatrical, musical and multimedia works realization; entertainment and show-halls management; movie assemblage, renting, hiring, production and reproduction; consulting services for programming; hiring of movies and films for instruction, didactic or entertaining purposes; dubbing photographic and cinematographic films; hiring of equipment in connection with cinematographic activity; publishing books and texts; film releasing, reproducing, distributing | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 6, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 9, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 7, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |