Drawing for NAVA

USPTO serial 79035223

NAVA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3501945Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 16, 2008
Examiner
KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with NAVA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kirk M. Miles

Kirk M. Miles The Webb Law Firm420 Fort Duquesne Boulevard, Suite 1200One Gateway CenterPittsburgh, PA 15222

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software stored on data carriers for use with medical patient monitoring equipment, for receiving, processing, transmitting, and displaying dataACTIVE—
010Catheters, in particular such for electromyographic examinations and measuring methods; devices for carrying out electromyographic examinations and measuring methods, namely, EMG analyzersACTIVE—
042Computer software development, namely, creating data processing programs stored on data carriers, in particular for processing electromyographic signals and for controlling breathing apparatus through the processing of electromyographic signalsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 27, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 9, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 18, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 29, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 24, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 10, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 19, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 16, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 9, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 8, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 16, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 19, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 16, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 4, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 4, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 1, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 12, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 23, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 20, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 19, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 19, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 20, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 22, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 22, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 7, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 7, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 7, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 14, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 3, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 16, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 16, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 13, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 12, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 30, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance