Drawing for KYOKU

USPTO serial 79035377

KYOKU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3445418Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 10, 2008
Examiner
KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KYOKU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN S EGBERT

JOHN S EGBERT EGBERT LAW OFFICES PLLC412 MAIN ST 7TH FLHOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Bleaching preparations for household and laundry use and other substances for laundry use, namely, laundry detergent and laundry sizing; general purpose cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations in the nature of liquids and powders; soaps; perfumery; essential oils; cosmetics; hair lotions; dentifricesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
018Unworked or semi-worked leather and imitations of leather, and goods made of these materials and not included in other classes, namely, bags, suitcases and wallets; animal skins, animal hides; trunks and travelling bags being leatherware; umbrellas, parasols and walking sticks; whips, harnesses and saddlerySECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
025Clothing, namely, shirts, pants, belts and dresses; footwear; headgear, namely, headwearSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 2017UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
May 19, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 19, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 24, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 28, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 28, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Sep 16, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 16, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 30, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 26, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 26, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 10, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 10, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 25, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 5, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 20, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 20, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 22, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 22, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 12, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 12, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 12, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 14, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 4, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 16, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 16, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 13, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 12, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 30, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance