USPTO serial 79035383
GRAEPEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3686146Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 22, 2009
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with GRAEPEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Friedrich Graepel Aktiengesellschaft
DE
Other trademarks owned by Friedrich Graepel Aktiengesellschaft
Friedrich Graepel Aktiengesellschaft
DE
Other trademarks owned by Friedrich Graepel Aktiengesellschaft
Friedrich Graepel Aktiengesellschaft
DE
Other trademarks owned by Friedrich Graepel Aktiengesellschaft
Friedrich Graepel Aktiengesellschaft
DE
Other trademarks owned by Friedrich Graepel Aktiengesellschaft
Sabbioneta (MN), IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin M. Kercher
15 South Laclede Station RoadWebster Groves, MO 63119-4282United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | [ transportable buildings of metal; ] goods of common metal, namely, [ antifriction metal, joists and bindings of metal, building panels of metal, ] sheets and plates of metal, steel sheets, [ roof coverings of metal, tile floorings of metal, foot scrapers of metal, floors of metal, ] boarding stairs of metal, mobile, for passengers, [ scaffolding of metal, cornices of metal, ] gratings of metal, [ tiles of metal for building, chests of metal, loading pallets and warehouse racks of metal, laths of metal, ] ladders and ladder rungs of metal, [ crash barriers of metal for roads, ] guard rails of metal, [ wall-claddings of metal, paving blocks of metal, tile floorings of metal, ] grates of metal, [ manhole covers of metal, sills of metal, swimming pools being metal structures, steel plates, steel buildings, steel masts, poles of metal, ] stair treads and staircases of metal, [ stringers being parts of staircases of metal; ] treads, entrances, foot boards, ventilation grilles, trim panels, sieves, conveyor sheets, namely, perforated and pre-formed metal sheets for use as sections of conveyor chains and belts, perforated plates, sheet steel pressings, drawn and deep-drawn parts, namely, perforated and unperforated metal treads, [ carrier plates, ] built-on parts and components and basic elements for assemblies, namely, step assemblies, namely, platforms, having perforated and unperforated metal treads, for mobile and stationary agricultural and construction machinery, for cranes, and for trucks and buses, all the aforesaid goods of metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | [ Machines and agricultural implements other than hand-operated and parts therefor, namely, bending machines, printing machines for use on sheet metal, air filters for engines, filters being parts of machines or engines, filtering machines, guides for machines, air suction machines, housings for machines, motors and engines, stands for machines, flour mills, winnowers, clack valves being parts of machines, cooling radiators for motors and engines, moving walkways, punching machines, filter presses, sifting installations, sieves being machines and parts of machines, sorting machines for industry, swaging machines, belts for conveyors, drums being parts of machines, shredders for industrial use ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | *parts for land vehicles, namely, shaped vehicle covers, motor vehicle bonnets, vehicle running boards, hoods for vehicles* | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | [ Treatment of materials, namely, electroplating and metal tempering, laser scribing of metal and sheet metal, metalworking, metal plating, welding, chromium plating, zinc plating, nickel plating ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Friedrich Graepel Aktiengesellschaft
- Other trademarks owned by Friedrich Graepel Aktiengesellschaft
- Other trademarks owned by Friedrich Graepel Aktiengesellschaft
- Other trademarks owned by Friedrich Graepel Aktiengesellschaft
- Other trademarks owned by Graepel Italiana S.p.A
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named GRAEPEL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 13, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2023 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2020 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2020 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 21, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 6, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 29, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 7, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 17, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 29, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 28, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 9, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 1, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 29, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 26, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |