USPTO serial 79035402
VISUCAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 8, 2008
- Examiner
- POWERS, ALEXANDER L
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VISUCAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
"S.A. LHOIST RECHERCHE ET DEVELOPPEMENT" en abrégé "L.R.D.", société anonyme
OTTIGNIES-LOUVAIN-LA-NEUVE, BE
"S.A. LHOIST; RECHERCHE ET DEVELOPPEMENT"; en abrégé "L.R.D.",; société anonyme
OTTIGNIES-LOUVAIN-LA-NEUVE, BE
"S.A. LHOIST; RECHERCHE ET DEVELOPPEMENT"; en abrégé "L.R.D.",; société anonyme
OTTIGNIES-LOUVAIN-LA-NEUVE, BE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas R. Wolf
DOUGLAS R. WOLF WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.600 ATLANTIC AVENUEBOSTON, MA 02210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals used in industry, namely, calcium carbonate, dolomite, half burnt dolomite, calcium oxide, dolomitic lime, hydrated lime or dolomitic hydrate and any mixtures of such chemicals, with or without the addition of additives such as silica, soda, caustic soda, boron or others, used as raw materials in the production of different types of glass, including lime-sodium glass for fiber glass, packaging and containers glass, technical glass, crystal glass, optical glass, alumoboro glass, boro-silica glass, quarz-glass, or used as opacifiers for glass, chemical preparations for preventing the tarnishing of glass, glass frosting chemicals; chemical preparations for preventing the tarnishing of glass, glass frosting chemicals, glass-staining chemicals, ceramic glaze | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services and research in the glass industry; industrial analysis and research services in the glass industry | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by "S.A. LHOIST RECHERCHE ET DEVELOPPEMENT" en abrégé "L.R.D.", société anonyme
- Other trademarks owned by "S.A. LHOIST; RECHERCHE ET DEVELOPPEMENT"; en abrégé "L.R.D.",; société anonyme
- Other trademarks owned by "S.A. LHOIST; RECHERCHE ET DEVELOPPEMENT"; en abrégé "L.R.D.",; société anonyme
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named VISUCAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 28, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 22, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 8, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 11, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 11, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |