USPTO serial 79035432
VISIBLE CELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3557654Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 6, 2009
- Examiner
- MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VISIBLE CELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing symposiums and workshops in the fields of molecular cell biology, bioinformatics, cell structure and function; educational services, namely, providing symposiums and workshops in the fields of molecular cell biology, bioinformatics, cell structure and function in an on-line environment; educational services namely providing educational exhibitions and educational information about classes in the fields of biology, bioinformatics, cell structure and function; educational services namely providing educational exhibitions and educational information about classes in the fields of biology, bioinformatics, cell structure and function in an on-line environment; providing on-line non-downloadable publications in the nature of leaflets and manuals in the fields of cellular atlases of mammalian cells in the fields of biology, bioinformatics, cell structure and function | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Research services, namely, scientific research in the fields of bioinformatics and scientific modeling; research services in relation to cellular and subcellular structures and function; scientific data modeling services in the field of cellular and subcellular structures and function; computer software development, namely, development of software research; computer software development, namely, development of software for scientific research for analysis and modeling; development of software research tools, namely, development of software for analysis of scientific results and modeling of cell structures; development of new technology for others in the field of scientific computer modeling, computer simulation and predictive modeling services; analysis of scientific results in the fields of bioinformatics, cell structure, cell anatomy and cell simulation | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The University of Queensland
- Other trademarks owned by The University of Queensland
- Other trademarks owned by The University of Queensland
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named VISIBLE CELL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 5, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 5, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 7, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 8, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 6, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 21, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 17, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |