USPTO serial 79035436
EEA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 401
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EEA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for business purposes; computer software used to assist an organisation in improving its customers' experiences | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Organization consultancy with a view to improving the organisation's customers' experiences; organization consultancy services relating to marketing; organization consultancy relating to the preparation of business statistics; organization consultancy relating to the improvement of services provided to customers; advisory services relating to market research; analysis of market research data; conducting of business research; conducting of market research; collection of information relating to business research; collection of information relating to market research; interpretation of business research data; interpretation of market research data; research services relating to business, not including any services relating to the provision or use of energy, water conservation or sewage | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2008 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 20, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |