Drawing for MUNDIAL 2010

USPTO serial 79035489

MUNDIAL 2010

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3814549Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 6, 2010
Examiner
MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MUNDIAL 2010?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James R Menker

James R Menker Holley & Menker, PAPO Box 331937Atlantic Beach, FL 32233UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007MACHINES FOR MAKING FIZZY DRINKS, NAMELY, MACHINES FOR MAKING CARBONATED AND AERATED BEVERAGES; ELECTRIC TIN CAN OPENERS; ELECTRO-MECHANICAL MACHINES FOR PRODUCING FOODSTUFFS, NAMELY, ELECTRIC FOOD CHOPPERS; ELECTRIC MIXING APPARATUS FOR HOUSEHOLD USE; ELECTRIC WHISKS FOR HOUSEHOLD USE; ELECTRIC FRUIT PRESSES FOR HOUSEHOLD USE; ELECTRIC FOOD PROCESSORS; ELECTRIC MIXERS FOR HOUSEHOLD USE; DISHWASHERS; WASHING MACHINES FOR HOUSEHOLD PURPOSES; IRONING MACHINES, NAMELY, ELECTRIC CLOTHING PRESSING MACHINES; SEWING MACHINES; VACUUM CLEANERS; VACUUM ACCESSORIES INCLUDED IN THIS CLASS, NAMELY, HOSES FOR VACUUM CLEANERS, VACUUM CLEANER BAGS, SUCTION NOZZLES FOR VACUUM CLEANERS, BRUSHES FOR VACUUM CLEANERS; COMPONENTS FOR VEHICLE ENGINES, NAMELY, OIL COOLERS, CAMSHAFTS FOR VEHICLE ENGINES, BEARINGS, ENGINE RODS, ENGINE SEALSSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
008HAND-OPERATED HAND TOOLS AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, HAND-OPERATED PUMPS, HAND-OPERATED DRILLS, HAND-OPERATED FILES; ELECTRIC AND NON-ELECTRIC RAZORS; DEPILATORY APPLIANCES; HAND TOOLS, NAMELY, TONGS; NON-ELECTRIC CURLING IRONS; NON-ELECTRIC FLAT IRONSSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 26, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
May 26, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 10, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 6, 2015REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 6, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 18, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 4, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 4, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 6, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 6, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 21, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 20, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 15, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 10, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 8, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 8, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 19, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 17, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 16, 2010ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 19, 2009DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 8, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 24, 2009DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2009ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 2009ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
May 19, 2009UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED—
May 18, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 18, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 18, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 14, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 14, 2009ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2009ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 25, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 11, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 11, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 16, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 16, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 10, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 9, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 9, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2008DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 26, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 24, 2008DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2008GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2008GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 27, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 27, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 27, 2007ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 9, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 9, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 16, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 16, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 16, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 28, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 4, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 18, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 18, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 15, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 14, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 5, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 5, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance