USPTO serial 79035501
FRENZELIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3540445Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 2, 2008
- Examiner
- HAMMEL, LAURA A
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with FRENZELIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DE
DE
DE
Frankenhammer 7, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sara Centioni Kanos
Sara Centioni Kanos Maynard Nexsen PC104 South Main Street, Suite 900Greenville, SC 29601United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | [ Plastic in the form of blocks, sheets, rods, films, and flexible pipes for use in manufacturing; foam insulation for use in building and construction; architectural acoustic sound absorbers and diffusers in the nature of plastic threads, ] plastic strips [ and plastic wires for noise insulation, thermal insulation, ] and industrial sealing applications in the automotive [ shipbuilding heating and air conditioning, electrical appliance and electric power ] industries; [ knitted fabric expansion joints for the repair of piping; electrical insulating tape; insulation tape for use on pipes and other air conditioning, refrigeration, heating and ventilation equipment; electrical insulating rubber cord; fiber-reinforced plastic composite sheets that are chemically resistant, electrically conductive, heat conductive, anti-adhesive and wear resistant and used in the manufacture of layered construction materials; protective shields, namely, heating insulating shields made from composite materials for use with industrial machinery; electromagnetic interference shielding gasket; thermal insulating blankets for the storage of machinery; fibers not for textile purposes, namely, glass fibers for use in the manufacture of building insulation; ] non-metal junctions made of fluorine containing resins and fabric, for water, gas, petrol pipes and conduits; non-metal soft gaskets, namely, non-asbestos, fibrous gaskets for use in connection with industrial applications, namely, lid seals [, air and water filters, air compressors ] and industrial engines; [ non-metal gaskets of coated and uncoated soft composite materials for lid seals, air and water filters, air compressors and industrial engines; ] fabric and elastomeric expansion joints for use in industrial piping and rigid ducting in ventilation and heating installations | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | [ Non-woven geotextiles, namely, fabric and sheeting for use in nurseries, greenhouses and landscaping; raw materials, namely, potters' clay; non-metal bullet-proof wall panels; non-metal bullet proof walls in the form of panels and boards; non-metal missile-proof walls in the form of panels and boards ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 024 | [ Semi-finished non-woven, carbon, aramid and polymer based fabrics for use in the manufacture of water filters; non-woven, synthetic, ] textile fabrics made of carbon, aramid and polymer fibers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Frenzelit-Werke GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Frenzelit-Werke GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Frenzelit-Werke GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Frenzelit GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named FRENZELIT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2024 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Apr 14, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2019 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 2, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 2, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 24, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2014 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jan 16, 2014 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 25, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 14, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |