USPTO serial 79035520
THE AUTHENTIC FOOD COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWNE, DAYNA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE AUTHENTIC FOOD COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
The Authentic Food Company Limited
Sharston, Manchester, GB
Other trademarks owned by The Authentic Food Company Limited
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MATTHEW J HIMICH
MATTHEW J HIMICH THOMPSON COBURN LLP505 N 7TH ST # WATERSAINT LOUIS, MO 63101-1612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat; fish, not live; poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved, dried, cooked and grilled fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams; eggs; milk and milk products, namely, milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; edible oils, edible fats; prepared meals and snacks consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry, game or vegetable; potato-based snack foods, vegetable-based snack foods, fruit-based snack foods, soy-based snack foods; fruit sauces, namely, applesauce and cranberry sauce | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca; sago; coffee substitutes, namely, artificial coffee or vegetable preparations for use as coffee; flour, processed cereals, pasta, bread, bread rolls, pastries, biscuits, cakes; confectionary, namely, chocolate candy sugar candy frozen confectionery chewing gum, peanut candy, almond candy; ice cream, ice milk ice milk bars, ice cream cakes; honey, treacle; yeast, baking powder; salt, mustard; vinegar, sauces, sauce mixes, spices; ice; prepared meals and snacks consisting primarily of pasta or rice; cereal-based snack foods; fruit sauces excluding applesauce and cranberry sauce | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 24, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 28, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 25, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 29, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 3, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 10, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 10, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 9, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |