USPTO serial 79035545
VIBATIV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3939879Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 5, 2011
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with VIBATIV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Tokyo 103-8411, JP
JP
JP
South San Francisco, CA
Theravance Biopharma Antibiotics IP, LLC
South San Francisco, US
Other trademarks owned by Theravance Biopharma Antibiotics IP, LLC
Cumberland Pharmaceuticals Inc.
US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kristina Montanaro Schrader
Kristina Montanaro Schrader Haverly MacArthur, Edward Playfair1600 West End AveSuite 1400Nashville, TN 37203Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Antibiotic preparations for human use, excluding dietetic substances or food preparations adapted for medical purposes, nutritional supplements, vitamins, mineral supplements, herbal supplements, dietary supplements and metabolic agents | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Astellas Pharma Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Astellas Pharma Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Astellas Pharma Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Theravance, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Theravance Biopharma Antibiotics IP, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Cumberland Pharmaceuticals Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named VIBATIV
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2023 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 22, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2021 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2021 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 17, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 19, 2021 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2019 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 12, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2013 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 1, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2009 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 13, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 1, 2009 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 12, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 25, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 12, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 16, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 16, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 15, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2007 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 10, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |