Drawing for LIGHT LINK

USPTO serial 79035567

LIGHT LINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3550336Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 23, 2008
Examiner
POLZER, NATALIE M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIGHT LINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Louis K. Ebling

Louis K. Ebling Greenebaum Doll & McDonald PLLC255 East Fifth Street2900 Chemed CenterCincinnati, OH 45202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electrical, electronic and optical fiber communications instruments and components for transmitting and receiving video, audio and data signals, namely, digital, communal and master antennas for radio and television, optical transmitters, optical receivers, optical data links, optical transceivers, cable television transmitters, digital transmitters, communication link testers for testing communication linksSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 14, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 14, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 7, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 2, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 2, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 24, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 24, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 1, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 1, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 23, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 23, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 7, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 25, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 17, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 11, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 11, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 3, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 27, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 8, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 8, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 23, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 23, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 21, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 21, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 17, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 30, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 30, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 27, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 26, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 5, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 5, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance